Create communication pathways between key staff and evaluators

Key action illustration

Evaluation is a collaborative process between the evaluator, key district staff, and program stakeholders. Now, before the evaluation is under way, is the time to plan the communication mechanisms you’ll use to work effectively with an evaluator. Communication is critical not just at the start of the evaluation, but throughout the process.

Resources

VIGNETTE Building Trust Between Evaluators and School Staff (.pdf 134.2 KB)

Review this district administrator’s account of how school staff may perceive an external evaluation to help you anticipate staff concerns and needs.

Preview Document


TOOL Checklist: Effective Communication About Data (.doc 74.5 KB)

Clarify expectations about what data will be available to an evaluator, what format they’ll be in, and when, how, and from whom they’ll be collected.

Preview Document


VIGNETTE Creating Lines of Communication (.pdf 142.2 KB)

Consider how this magnet program director’s experience might help you shape your own district’s communications with an evaluator.

Preview Document


SAMPLE MATERIAL Communication With School Staff About Magnet Program and Evaluation (.pdf 438.9 KB)

Get ideas for sharing information with your magnet school staff to ensure a common understanding of magnet program goals, activities, and evaluation needs.

Preview Document


Extra Resources for MSAP Rigorous Evaluation

SAMPLE MATERIAL Communication With Families About Experimental Design (.pdf 238 KB)

See how specialized communication to families about the use of experimental design can inform, reassure, and enlist families’ support for the evaluation process.

Preview Document


TIP

Highlight photo

Relationships and communication are the most important part of an evaluation. If there are good relationships between the district and the evaluator, quality data collection will follow.

—Halley Freitas, Tucson Unified School District

TIP

Highlight photo

We have a monthly magnet staff meeting with the people at the school sites. At every meeting we get updates on our evaluation. We see what’s going well and what’s not in terms of the actual mechanics of submitting the evaluation documents and what we’re learning.

—Joe Gallagher, New York City School District 22

TIP

Highlight photo

The evaluator was familiar with our approach and we could partner with them immediately. We had everything outlined before we even knew we had the grant. Our schools were already aware of the data collection process. In fact, the first year of the grant felt like the second year because we had put so much in place early on.

—Kim Morrison, Winston-Salem/ Forsyth County Schools